We’ve gathered the best insights from our members to share with you each month. Get to know your peers, and get the latest news directly from these industry insiders!
Lawrence Scherer, Esq., CPA, LL.M. Taxation

Using Disclaimers to Correct, Modify, or Implement a Decedent’s Estate Plan after Decedent’s Death
In this month’s installment of “Estate Planning Techniques You Should Know”, we address a valuable post-death planning technique called a Disclaimer. By using a disclaimer (also known in New York as a “Renunciation”), you can correct, modify, or implement a decedent’s estate plan after their death.
| A disclaimer works by the recipient refusing some or all of an inheritance. For purposes of any property disclaimed, the recipient is deemed to have predeceased the decedent, and the property goes to the next person in line (who can also refuse to accept part or all of that inheritance). Sounds confusing? It really isn’t. Imagine someone at Thanksgiving saying, “No more turkey, please.” That’s essentially what a disclaimer looks like, although it’s formalized in writing.
To be effective, a disclaimer must:
Practical Application For example, there is an unlimited marital deduction. However, if the surviving spouse’s estate would become taxable because of the property received from their deceased spouse, they can use a disclaimer. If the decedent’s Last Will and Testament gives the entire residuary estate to their spouse, the spouse can disclaim some or all of that property. As a result, the property transfers as if the spouse had not been the survivor and may go to the children. Many estate plans direct that if the spouse disclaims, instead of going to the children, the disclaimed property is retained in a trust for the spouse’s benefit. This allows the spouse to retain the benefit of their inheritance while reducing the tax impact of keeping their inheritance. The disclaimer can place some or all of those assets into a trust for the spouse’s benefit, potentially saving estate taxes. Disclaimers can also correct poorly formed estate plans. Corrections can be made by one person or multiple people disclaiming unintended inheritance interests. To properly file a disclaimer, remember two key points:
IRS Announces 2025 Updated Estate, Gift, and Generation-Skipping Tax NumbersThe IRS released Revenue Procedure 2024-40, announcing 2025 exclusion limitations for various tax provisions:
Nassau County – Excessive Red Light Camera Fees to be Refunded… MaybeOn December 9, 2024, the Nassau County Legislature introduced legislation to repeal excessive and illegal red light camera fees and provide refunds for drivers. A recent NYS appellate court unanimously ruled that additional fees on red light camera tickets were illegal. The penalty was capped at $50, but Nassau County added surcharges from $15 in 2011 to $100 in 2017. The proposed legislation requires an inquiry into these illegal charges and a plan for refunding excessive charges. How the county will fund this refund program remains undisclosed. My Take: If enacted, this would be a major step in correcting the non-tax taxes Nassau residents must bear. Now, if only Nassau County would address the extremely high deed recording fees ($770 compared to less than $30 in many parts of the country). Boilerplate Language Upheld; Riders Can’t Sue Uber – So Read Online Agreements CarefullyOn November 25, 2024, the New York State Court of Appeals ruled in Wu v. Uber Tech Inc. that riders injured in an Uber vehicle are bound by the mandatory arbitration clause in the click-to-accept online agreement. The rider had filed a lawsuit, but Uber argued for dismissal based on the arbitration clause. The court ruled that by clicking to accept Uber’s terms, the plaintiff agreed to the binding arbitration clause and could not sue. Texas Court Finds the Corporate Transparency Act Unconstitutional – Stop the Presses… or Maybe Not!On December 3, 2024, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas blocked enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) nationwide, issuing an injunction less than 30 days before the 12-31-24 deadline. The CTA required approximately 33.5 million small businesses to disclose beneficial ownership information to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. The court ruled that the Treasury Department’s requirements exceeded Congressional authority.
The government is expected to appeal. If the ban is upheld, we anticipate minor revisions and a reintroduction of the CTA. Recommendation: Complete any filings already begun, but hold off on initiating new filings until further guidance is provided. At Year’s End, We Highlight Silly Laws That Remain on the BooksHere are a few notable examples: New York
Texas
Alabama
New Hampshire
South Dakota
North Carolina
In addition to being a co-founder of the LIAFPN, Larry Scherer has a strong background in Trust & Estates and Elder Law and serves as Managing Member of Scherer & Pudell, PLLC, a transactional law firm in Garden City, NY. He can be reached at (516) 747-7007. Connect on LinkedIn. |
